« December 30, 2002 | Home | January 01, 2003 »

December 31, 2002

¡Doh!

My new TV pastime is watching my usual sitcoms in Spanish on the second audio program (SAP), with the English closed-captions. Did I mention I’m easily, or rather, oddly amused? (This is akin to my habit of fiddling with my DVD settings, so as to watch originally English-language movies in alternative languages like French with subtitles, for that foreign film effect.) So far I’ve watched The Simpsons and Will & Grace. I’d say of the Spanish cast, the voice of Marge sounds most like her English counterpart.

Auld lang syne. So here’s a fond farewell to 2002. Thanks for reading, all you Rebel rousers, you. ‘Til next year!

A good hobbit is hard to find; ‘Birthday Girl’ not a party

Sean Astin and Elijah WoodThe other day I took an online quiz to determine my ideal Lord of the Rings mate. It’s Sam. I believe it all hinged on the question of occupation: “What does he do?” Answer: “Frodo.”

Ha. I can’t wait to see the new movie. I’m determined to finish the book first, and I’m about a third of the way through.

Speaking of movies, yesterday I saw Birthday Girl, an underpromoted (for good reason) film starring Nicole Kidman and Ben Chaplin. I read some of the reviews just now—I wish I had read them before seeing the movie, and saved myself some trouble—and Roger Ebert sums it up:

There is a curious problem with Birthday Girl, hard to put your finger on: The movie is kind of sour. It wants to be funny and a little nasty, it wants to surprise us and then console us, but what it mostly does is make us restless.

Right. And I would add this: the burden of an “opposites attract” love story is to convince the audience that the ostensibly mismatched lovers actually should get together. If it doesn’t succeed in that, it loses the audience. You’d rather they not bother with the whole sordid business. Here, not until the very last moment of the film did I care if Kidman and Chaplin’s characters finally hooked up. And that, my friends, is too late. (Notwithstanding, admiring the handsome Ben Chaplin is somewhat of a consolation.)

Zen and the art of shopping

Have I lost the will to shop? Perhaps, at least for clothing. I feel something approaching guilt (especially in this season when we are reminded to share with the less fortunate) in saying that I have too many clothes. It’s true. My closet runneth over. One of these days I need to head over to the clothing drive and donate a pile of stuff.

My shopping strategy for the past couple of years has been to create a wardrobe consisting of a few basic items, but in multiple colors. (I think some part of me wants to recreate a kind of satellite Banana Republic in my apartment, down to the furniture and matching wooden hangers.) So have I finally reached, dare I say exceeded, that wardrobe nirvana? That tipping point of zen-like sartorial contentment? Maybe. I own more than a manageable number of jackets, sweaters, shirts, and pants all in a palette of personally suitable colors. I found myself at the mall yesterday, thinking, do I really need anything else?

Oh wait. Yes, a pair of dark brown oxfords. There’s always something. But in any case, I definitely need to prune my wardrobe, if only to clean up my apartment. If only to make room for more clothes.

These days my shopping habits have shifted toward all things domestic, which explains my recently intensified obsession with Ikea, Pottery Barn, and their ilk. Anything to organize my place, and make it more liveable. To wit, I’m still excited over the gleaming new Calphalon saucepan and skillet I bought a few weeks ago. I admit, it may seem a little boring (unböring?), but it’s wonderful when a small bit of happiness is found in nothing more than a plush rug or a sturdy bookshelf.