Beating around the Bush

Did Bush really answer any of the questions posed to him at his press conference last night? I don’t know how he managed not to appear all blurry on the TV screen, what with all the dodging he was doing. (Though his tie was pretty hypnotic.)

There’s a spot-on column in Slate today (“Trust, Don’t Verify”), which highlights Bush’s faulty logic: credibility is merely consistency.

To Bush, credibility means that you keep saying today what you said yesterday, and that you do today what you promised yesterday. “A free Iraq will confirm to a watching world that America’s word, once given, can be relied upon,” he argued Tuesday night. When the situation is clear and requires pure courage, this steadfastness is Bush’s most useful trait. But when the situation is unclear, Bush’s notion of credibility turns out to be dangerously unhinged. The only words and deeds that have to match are his. No correspondence to reality is required. Bush can say today what he said yesterday, and do today what he promised yesterday, even if nothing he believes about the rest of the world is true. […]

Three times, Bush repeated the answer he gave to Edwin Chen of the Los Angeles Times: “Had there been a threat that required action by anybody in the government, I would have dealt with it.” Outside Bush’s head, the statement was patently false: The 9/11 threat required action, and Bush failed to deal with it. But inside Bush’s head, the statement was tautological: If there were a threat that required action, Bush would have dealt with it; Bush didn’t deal with it; therefore, there was no threat that required action. The third time Bush repeated this answer—in response to a question about whether he owed an “apology to the American people for failing them prior to 9/11”—he added, “The person responsible for the attacks was Osama Bin Laden.” This is how Bush’s mind works: Only a bad person can bear responsibility for a bad thing. I am a good person. Therefore, I bear no responsibility.

Related: Howard Kurtz’s roundup of media reaction (“Bush Admits No Mistakes”).

About this entry

This page contains a single entry by Jeff published on April 14, 2004 3:08 PM.

The ninth-symphony stretch was the previous entry in this blog.

Romeo in bed is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the home page or look in the archives to find all content.

Recent entries

  • Links for 2008-8-8

    Sorting out Coffee’s Contradictions [New York Times] “As with any product used to excess, consumers often wonder about the health consequences of caffeine.” (tags:...

  • Bernadette Peters concert

    On Friday night we had a great time seeing Bernadette Peters sing with the San Francisco Symphony. (If I remember correctly, the first time I...

  • 'TV Dinner'

    The latest cat cartoon from Simon Tofield, “TV Dinner”: Funny, ‘cause it’s true. Though our cats don’t know how to use the remote control …...

  • SF AIDS Walk 2008

    I’m walking in the San Francisco AIDS Walk on Sunday, July 20, 2008! I’ve done two walks so far (D.C. and San Francisco) and am...

  • Another year

    I was uploading some recent Disneyland photos and also decided to look back through some family albums to find photos from my childhood vacations to...

Close