« May 03, 2004 | Home | May 05, 2004 »

May 04, 2004

Could your home be next?

Forget about lead in the drinking water. Or even the imminent plague of cicadas. IKEA infestations are reaching epidemic levels, reports the always insightful Onion. An excerpt:

“This epidemic of self-assembled, clean-lined modernist furniture is still largely contained to densely populated urban areas, but the danger exists that it will spread to other regions throughout America,” CIDC [(Center for Interior Design Control)] spokesman Chris Greeves said Tuesday. “At the rate it’s moving, our nation could suffer European levels of Scandinavian design within a decade.”

Greeves said IKEA is not easily controlled, as it spreads largely through word of mouth.

“It passes between rooms until it has infested not only your living room, but also your 1.5 bathrooms, your cleanly appointed kitchen, and then your entire sun-drenched, open-plan loft apartment. In the most extreme cases, it will even spread to the string-light-decorated rooftop patio overlooking your recently gentrified neighborhood.”

Heh. Are you a carrier? I can just see the opportunities: IKEA Walk (raise money to find a cure and save living rooms everywhere from this design-debilitating condition!), and ooh, can there be some sort of ribbon people can wear?

By way of disclaimer, this is all in good fun: I myself am guilty of spending inordinate amounts of time poring over the IKEA catalog. But I haven’t made a purchase. Yet.

A series of actionable mistakes

At President Bush’s press conference last month, when he was asked to single out what he thought was his biggest mistake, I honestly pictured him saying, “Well, there’ve been so many mistakes, I don’t know where to start.” The Center for American Progress goes one better (actually, one hundred better) and lists “100 Mistakes for the President To Choose From” (link via Andy).

Another interesting bit from the Center for American Progress website, this time regarding the federal marriage amendment: “The Speech the President Should Have Given” by Mark David Agrast (Mar. 22, 2004). An excerpt:

I respect the personal convictions of those who support an amendment, and I personally share their discomfort about the prospect of same-sex marriages. I also support the right of religious denominations to define marriage for religious purposes, just as the states define marriage for civil purposes. But that right is not threatened. And as your president, I do not have the luxury of indulging my private feelings. I am the president of all the people, including our gay and lesbian fellow citizens. Laura and I have many friends—including prominent members of my administration—who have children and other family members who are gay or lesbian. They want the best for their children—as do we all. And I cannot find it within myself to say to them that the desire of their children to marry poses a threat to our society that it takes a constitutional amendment to avert.

Ah, if only.